JAGDEV SINGH BHATOA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/13312/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010724822026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/26035/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/13312/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Bench Type
Double
Category
97.21 - VIRES-ELECTION ( 864 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDEV SINGH BHATOA
Adv. NIKHIL GHAI
-
2.JAGDEV SINGH BHATOA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.JAGDEV SINGH BHATOA
-
3.Department of Local Government
-
4.Deputy Commissioner,
-
5.Sub Divisional Magistrate Morinda
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP No. 13312/2026 The Punjab High Court dismissed Jagdev Singh Bhatoa's petition challenging municipal elections scheduled for May 26, 2026. The petitioner argued the municipality's 5-year tenure should be counted from the Vice President election on November 25, 2022, not from the oath-taking ceremony on May 4, 2021. The court held that the "first meeting" under Section 13 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, begins when oath is administered to newly elected councillors, regardless of whether President/Vice President elections occur simultaneously. Since councillors received salaries and became municipal members from May 4, 2021, extending their tenure beyond 5 years would violate the statutory limit and Article 243(U) of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/13312/2026
Case Summary: CWP No. 13312/2026 The Punjab High Court dismissed Jagdev Singh Bhatoa's petition challenging municipal elections scheduled for May 26, 2026. The petitioner argued the municipality's 5-year tenure should be counted from the Vice President election on November 25, 2022, not from the oath-taking ceremony on May 4, 2021. The court held that the "first meeting" under Section 13 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, begins when oath is administered to newly elected councillors, regardless of whether President/Vice President elections occur simultaneously. Since councillors received salaries and became municipal members from May 4, 2021, extending their tenure beyond 5 years would violate the statutory limit and Article 243(U) of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts