PAWAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/13298/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010724232026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/25973/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13298/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.12 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SR.EDU DEPT)RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 707 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. P.L. VERMA

  2. 2.Pawan Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Pawan Kumar

  3. 3.The Director of School Education Haryana

  4. 4.The District Education Officer,

  5. 5.The Principal Accountant Genera

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pawan Kumar's petition seeking release of withheld gratuity of ₹10,06,200 with interest. The State contended the gratuity was lawfully withheld per the petitioner's own undertaking dated 12.09.2024, which stipulated release only after decision in a related case (CWP-37526-2019) regarding selection grade arrears. Since the petitioner's counsel did not dispute this fact, the court found no grounds to entertain the petition and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13298/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pawan Kumar's petition seeking release of withheld gratuity of ₹10,06,200 with interest. The State contended the gratuity was lawfully withheld per the petitioner's own undertaking dated 12.09.2024, which stipulated release only after decision in a related case (CWP-37526-2019) regarding selection grade arrears. Since the petitioner's counsel did not dispute this fact, the court found no grounds to entertain the petition and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case