ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA — CWP/13221/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010723242026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/25948/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/13221/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Adv. SAMIR RATHAUR
-
2.Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
-
2.Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/13221/2026 Court Decision: The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the government's advisory prohibiting release of the documentary "Lawrence of Punjab." Justice Jagmohan Bansal found the blocking order unjustified, holding that the documentary does not glorify gangsters or violate court orders, and that it cannot reasonably be said to threaten public order. Key Reasoning: After personally viewing the documentary, the court determined it is a factual compilation featuring public domain material and commentary from retired police officers and journalists—not a film glorifying criminals. The court emphasized that the government failed to formally record its satisfaction under Section 69A of the IT Act, and that similar crime-based content widely exists. The court allowed release only with modifications: the title and promotional materials must remove references to "Lawrence," "Bishnoi," and "Punjab." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/13221/2026
Case Summary: CWP/13221/2026 Court Decision: The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the government's advisory prohibiting release of the documentary "Lawrence of Punjab." Justice Jagmohan Bansal found the blocking order unjustified, holding that the documentary does not glorify gangsters or violate court orders, and that it cannot reasonably be said to threaten public order. Key Reasoning: After personally viewing the documentary, the court determined it is a factual compilation featuring public domain material and commentary from retired police officers and journalists—not a film glorifying criminals. The court emphasized that the government failed to formally record its satisfaction under Section 69A of the IT Act, and that similar crime-based content widely exists. The court allowed release only with modifications: the title and promotional materials must remove references to "Lawrence," "Bishnoi," and "Punjab." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts