JASWANT vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CRM-M/24174/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010720622026
Filing Number
CRM-M/33415/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/24174/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASWANT
Adv. S.P. YADAV
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M No. 24174/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Jaswant, who was arrested for alleged offenses under Sections 109(1) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (abetment and criminal intimidation). The court held that the petitioner qualified for bail based on: one month and twenty-one days custody, clean antecedents, no actual injury to the complainant, completed investigation, and no risk of evidence tampering or witness influence. Key Reasoning: Justice Surya Partap Singh emphasized that bail is the general rule and detention the exception under criminal jurisprudence. The court referenced Supreme Court principles on presumption of innocence and speedy trial rights, noting that prolonged undertrial imprisonment would constitute grave injustice. Bail was granted on conditions including furnishing bonds, not intimidating witnesses, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/24174/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M No. 24174/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Jaswant, who was arrested for alleged offenses under Sections 109(1) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (abetment and criminal intimidation). The court held that the petitioner qualified for bail based on: one month and twenty-one days custody, clean antecedents, no actual injury to the complainant, completed investigation, and no risk of evidence tampering or witness influence. Key Reasoning: Justice Surya Partap Singh emphasized that bail is the general rule and detention the exception under criminal jurisprudence. The court referenced Supreme Court principles on presumption of innocence and speedy trial rights, noting that prolonged undertrial imprisonment would constitute grave injustice. Bail was granted on conditions including furnishing bonds, not intimidating witnesses, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts