VIKRAM vs DEENBANDU CHHOTU RAM UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ANOTHER — CWP/13290/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section Articles 14, 16 and 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010720192026

e-Filing Number

27-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/25778/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13290/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.14-SERVICE MATTERS SCOSB (HARYANA) (EDUCATION) ( 1514 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Articles 14, 16 and 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM

    Adv. BHUPINDER MALIK

  2. 2.Vikram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEENBANDU CHHOTU RAM UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.Vikram

  3. 3.Vice Chancellor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Case Summary: Vikram sought a writ of mandamus requiring Deenbandu Chhotu Ram University to extend salary increments and Assured Career Progression (ACP) benefits from July 2021, citing an earlier favorable judgment in the Parveen Kumar case. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya held that the University is bound to extend benefits to all similarly placed employees without requiring individual court petitions, and directed the University Registrar to decide the petitioner's pending representation (dated 24.03.2026) within three months with a reasoned order, threatening ₹50,000 costs if the deadline is missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13290/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vikram sought a writ of mandamus requiring Deenbandu Chhotu Ram University to extend salary increments and Assured Career Progression (ACP) benefits from July 2021, citing an earlier favorable judgment in the Parveen Kumar case. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya held that the University is bound to extend benefits to all similarly placed employees without requiring individual court petitions, and directed the University Registrar to decide the petitioner's pending representation (dated 24.03.2026) within three months with a reasoned order, threatening ₹50,000 costs if the deadline is missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case