RAJENDER @ RAJU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/24094/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010718912026

Filing Number

CRM-M/33310/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/24094/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDER @ RAJU

    Adv. KARTAR SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M No. 24094/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Rajender @ Raju in an electricity theft case (Section 136, Electricity Act 2003). The court found that after 5+ months in custody, with investigation complete and a maximum 3-year sentence, continued detention served no purpose. The court emphasized that bail is the general rule, not exception, and noted the constitutional right to speedy trial cannot be denied to undertrial prisoners. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including personal/surety bonds and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24094/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M No. 24094/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Rajender @ Raju in an electricity theft case (Section 136, Electricity Act 2003). The court found that after 5+ months in custody, with investigation complete and a maximum 3-year sentence, continued detention served no purpose. The court emphasized that bail is the general rule, not exception, and noted the constitutional right to speedy trial cannot be denied to undertrial prisoners. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including personal/surety bonds and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case