TALWINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/24622/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010718652025

Filing Number

CRM-M/37613/2025

Filing Date

05-May-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/24622/2025

Registration Date

05-May-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Coram

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39.13 - ANTICIPATORY BAIL (AGNST WOMEN) ( 285 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TALWINDER SINGH

    Adv. NAVEEN BATRA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Kirti SinghView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Talwinder Singh's petition for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forced marriage, finding that after the petitioner joined the investigation on 08.04.2026, he was no longer required for further investigation. The court granted protection from arrest subject to conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and remaining in India, while clarifying this protection is limited to the specific FIR and reserved liberty for the investigating agency to seek cancellation upon violation of terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24622/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Talwinder Singh's petition for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forced marriage, finding that after the petitioner joined the investigation on 08.04.2026, he was no longer required for further investigation. The court granted protection from arrest subject to conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and remaining in India, while clarifying this protection is limited to the specific FIR and reserved liberty for the investigating agency to seek cancellation upon violation of terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case