RANJIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/24655/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010717602025

Filing Number

CRM-M/37545/2025

Filing Date

05-May-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/24655/2025

Registration Date

05-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT SINGH

    Adv. ARNAV GHAI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Ranjit Singh, accused of murdering Tarlochan Singh in September 2024. The court found that the eyewitness credibility was seriously compromised because witnesses supported the prosecution's case only against the petitioner but retracted allegations against two co-accused, and the petitioner had already served 1 year 7 months in custody with no criminal antecedents. The court noted that since key witnesses were already examined, witness tampering risks no longer existed and the merits would be assessed after trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24655/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Ranjit Singh, accused of murdering Tarlochan Singh in September 2024. The court found that the eyewitness credibility was seriously compromised because witnesses supported the prosecution's case only against the petitioner but retracted allegations against two co-accused, and the petitioner had already served 1 year 7 months in custody with no criminal antecedents. The court noted that since key witnesses were already examined, witness tampering risks no longer existed and the merits would be assessed after trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case