NARAYAN DASS vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/24748/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010717422026

Filing Number

CRM-M/33221/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/24748/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYAN DASS

    Adv. RUHANI CHADHA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M No.24748/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Narayan Dass in an NDPS drug case. The court held that since no original challan was filed against him and a stay order was issued against the trial court's direction that led to his prosecution, his continued detention was unjustified and illegal. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's foundation to be unstable, as it rested entirely on judicial remarks made by a trial judge directing police investigation into Dass's role—remarks that were already stayed by the High Court in a separate petition challenging their validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24748/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M No.24748/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to petitioner Narayan Dass in an NDPS drug case. The court held that since no original challan was filed against him and a stay order was issued against the trial court's direction that led to his prosecution, his continued detention was unjustified and illegal. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's foundation to be unstable, as it rested entirely on judicial remarks made by a trial judge directing police investigation into Dass's role—remarks that were already stayed by the High Court in a separate petition challenging their validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case