AMAN KUMAR BANSAL AMANDEEP KAUR vs STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB — CWP/13122/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010713092026

e-Filing Number

27-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/25494/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13122/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.11 - WRIT (RTI) ( 737 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAN KUMAR BANSAL AMANDEEP KAUR

  2. 2.Aman Kumar Bansal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB

  2. 2.Aman Kumar Bansal

  3. 3.SDM Payal

  4. 4.Shree Raghunath Hospital Society

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Aman Kumar Bansal's writ petition challenging the State Information Commission's rejection of his RTI appeal. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish that Respondent No. 3 (a charitable hospital) qualifies as a "public authority" under the RTI Act, finding insufficient evidence that land gifted by a private cooperative society and unsubstantiated claims of ₹31 lakh government funding met the statutory definition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13122/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Aman Kumar Bansal's writ petition challenging the State Information Commission's rejection of his RTI appeal. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish that Respondent No. 3 (a charitable hospital) qualifies as a "public authority" under the RTI Act, finding insufficient evidence that land gifted by a private cooperative society and unsubstantiated claims of ₹31 lakh government funding met the statutory definition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case