NIMBA RAM ALIAS NIBA RAM ALIAS CHAUTALA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/23804/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010710252026

Filing Number

CRM-M/32915/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/23804/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIMBA RAM ALIAS NIBA RAM ALIAS CHAUTALA

    Adv. ARSHDEEP SINGH BRAR

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Nimba Ram, accused of animal cruelty and violations of the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan Act for allegedly throwing cattle from a vehicle, causing one death and injuries. The court found that after over three months in custody with investigation complete and charges not yet framed, further detention violated Article 21 rights and contravened the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." Prior criminal involvement could not solely justify bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/23804/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Nimba Ram, accused of animal cruelty and violations of the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan Act for allegedly throwing cattle from a vehicle, causing one death and injuries. The court found that after over three months in custody with investigation complete and charges not yet framed, further detention violated Article 21 rights and contravened the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." Prior criminal involvement could not solely justify bail denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case