PASTER BAWA BHATTI ALIAS JASSU DASS vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/24327/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010709292026

Filing Number

CRM-M/32881/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/24327/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASTER BAWA BHATTI ALIAS JASSU DASS

    Adv. HIMANI KAPILA

  2. 2.PASTER BAWA BHATTI @ JASSU DASS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.PASTER BAWA BHATTI @ JASSU DASS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/24327/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pastor Bawa Bhatti's anticipatory bail petition in a fraud case. The petitioner allegedly cheated the complainant of Rs. 22 lakh by falsely promising to secure UK and Canadian work visas for the complainant's wife, sending fake visa documents instead and never returning the money despite the complainant's awareness of the enquiry. The court found a prima facie case established under sections 316, 214, 61 BNS 2023 (cheating and dishonesty), holding that custodial interrogation was necessary to advance the investigation, rejecting the petitioner's argument that lack of interrogation need justified bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24327/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/24327/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pastor Bawa Bhatti's anticipatory bail petition in a fraud case. The petitioner allegedly cheated the complainant of Rs. 22 lakh by falsely promising to secure UK and Canadian work visas for the complainant's wife, sending fake visa documents instead and never returning the money despite the complainant's awareness of the enquiry. The court found a prima facie case established under sections 316, 214, 61 BNS 2023 (cheating and dishonesty), holding that custodial interrogation was necessary to advance the investigation, rejecting the petitioner's argument that lack of interrogation need justified bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case