MANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/24210/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010704892025

Filing Number

CRM-M/36921/2025

Filing Date

02-May-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/24210/2025

Registration Date

02-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS

    Adv. SWATI VERMA

  2. 2.MANDEEP SINGH

  3. 3.SARDOOL SINGH

  4. 4.HARPREET KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.BALDEV SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.70 (dated 25.08.2023) registered under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 against petitioners Mandeep Singh and others based on a genuine compromise reached between the parties on 19.03.2025. The Court found the compromise was made without pressure, coercion, or undue influence, and with remote chances of conviction, justifying exercise of Section 482 Cr.PC powers to prevent unnecessary criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24210/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.70 (dated 25.08.2023) registered under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 against petitioners Mandeep Singh and others based on a genuine compromise reached between the parties on 19.03.2025. The Court found the compromise was made without pressure, coercion, or undue influence, and with remote chances of conviction, justifying exercise of Section 482 Cr.PC powers to prevent unnecessary criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case