SAGAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/24163/2025

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010703652025

Filing Number

CRM-M/36884/2025

Filing Date

02-May-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/24163/2025

Registration Date

02-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAGAR

    Adv. PANKAJ NANHERA

  2. 2.SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M-24163-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Sagar's bail petition on 24.03.2026, rejecting his plea for regular bail in a murder case (FIR No. 15). The petitioner was accused of firing a fatal gunshot at Kapil's chest during a marriage ceremony on 16.01.2022, allegedly after co-accused demanded withdrawal of an earlier case. The court found the prosecution's case prima facie credible, supported by forensic evidence linking the recovered weapon to the fatal bullet, a postmortem report confirming death from gunshot injury, and the petitioner's direct role as the main assailant. While acknowledging the petitioner's prolonged custody (since 19.01.2022), the court held that mere incarceration duration cannot ground bail in grave offences, especially when witness examination is ongoing and apprehensions of tampering exist. The court emphasized that offences striking at public order and societal conscience warrant detention despite delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/24163/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M-24163-2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Sagar's bail petition on 24.03.2026, rejecting his plea for regular bail in a murder case (FIR No. 15). The petitioner was accused of firing a fatal gunshot at Kapil's chest during a marriage ceremony on 16.01.2022, allegedly after co-accused demanded withdrawal of an earlier case. The court found the prosecution's case prima facie credible, supported by forensic evidence linking the recovered weapon to the fatal bullet, a postmortem report confirming death from gunshot injury, and the petitioner's direct role as the main assailant. While acknowledging the petitioner's prolonged custody (since 19.01.2022), the court held that mere incarceration duration cannot ground bail in grave offences, especially when witness examination is ongoing and apprehensions of tampering exist. The court emphasized that offences striking at public order and societal conscience warrant detention despite delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case