AYUB IMRAN BAIG EX SEPOY DRIVER vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/13539/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010702992026

e-Filing Number

24-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/25186/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/13539/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Bench Type

Double

Category

4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYUB IMRAN BAIG EX SEPOY DRIVER

    Adv. ARUN SINGLA

  2. 2.Union of India and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Union of India and others

  3. 3.Chief of Army Staff,

  4. 4.General Officer Commanding,

  5. 5.Commandant,

  6. 6.Chief Records Officer,

  7. 7.Armed Forces Tribunal,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The High Court disposed of the petition without deciding the merits, allowing ex-Sepoy Ayub Imran Baig to file a representation with the competent authority regarding conversion of his dismissal (for contracting plural marriage after 14 years of service) into discharge to claim pension benefits. The Union undertook to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks accepting or rejecting the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13539/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of the petition without deciding the merits, allowing ex-Sepoy Ayub Imran Baig to file a representation with the competent authority regarding conversion of his dismissal (for contracting plural marriage after 14 years of service) into discharge to claim pension benefits. The Union undertook to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks accepting or rejecting the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case