SABIR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/25687/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010699762025

Filing Number

CRM-M/36707/2025

Filing Date

01-May-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/25687/2025

Registration Date

08-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABIR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. MAZLISH KHAN

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.SAKIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.SAKIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/25687/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 0001 (dated 01.07.2022) registered at Cyber Crime Police Station, Panipat, under Sections 420/406 IPC and related sections, based on a genuine compromise reached between the petitioners (Sabir and another) and the complainant dated 12.07.2024. The trial court verified the compromise was voluntary, without coercion, and all parties consented to the FIR's quashing. The court applied precedent principles from *Gian Singh v. State of Punjab* to grant relief, with parties bound by compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25687/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/25687/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 0001 (dated 01.07.2022) registered at Cyber Crime Police Station, Panipat, under Sections 420/406 IPC and related sections, based on a genuine compromise reached between the petitioners (Sabir and another) and the complainant dated 12.07.2024. The trial court verified the compromise was voluntary, without coercion, and all parties consented to the FIR's quashing. The court applied precedent principles from *Gian Singh v. State of Punjab* to grant relief, with parties bound by compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case