RAJWANT KAUR ALIAS RAJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRR/1433/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010699762023
Filing Number
CRR/41817/2023
Filing Date
25-May-2023
Registration No
CRR/1433/2023
Registration Date
01-Jun-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat
Coram
Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat
Bench Type
Single
Category
37.1 - CRIMINAL REVISION (I.O.) ( 224 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJWANT KAUR ALIAS RAJ
Adv. SURINDER THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB
-
2.SSP
-
3.SHO (Station House Officer)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF
Case Summary: CRR/1433/2023 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and quashed the Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide) charge against Rajwant Kaur, ordering her discharge. Key Reasoning: The court found that to convict under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear mens rea and a positive act proximate to the suicide that compelled the victim to commit suicide. Here, the deceased (Karam Chand) had pre-planned his act by bringing petrol on his two-wheeler and set himself ablaze after the petitioner refused his advances—demonstrating no abetment by the accused. Mere allegations of harassment without proximate causative action cannot sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/1433/2023
Case Summary: CRR/1433/2023 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition and quashed the Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide) charge against Rajwant Kaur, ordering her discharge. Key Reasoning: The court found that to convict under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear mens rea and a positive act proximate to the suicide that compelled the victim to commit suicide. Here, the deceased (Karam Chand) had pre-planned his act by bringing petrol on his two-wheeler and set himself ablaze after the petitioner refused his advances—demonstrating no abetment by the accused. Mere allegations of harassment without proximate causative action cannot sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts