PUNAM vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRWP/4823/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010698672026

Filing Number

CRWP/32284/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRWP/4823/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

42.1 - CRIMINAL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) ( 311 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNAM

    Adv. GITESH SHARMA

  2. 2.PUNAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.PUNAM

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDENT POLICE

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) PASSIANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP-4823-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Punam's habeas corpus petition seeking custody of her four minor children. The court found that the petitioner had abandoned her husband and children in February 2025 and left her matrimonial home, and after the husband's death in April 2026, the children were living with their paternal aunt and uncle (respondents 5 and 7). The court, after interacting with all four children who expressed their preference to remain with their relatives, disposed of the petition while leaving the petitioner free to pursue alternative legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/4823/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP-4823-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Punam's habeas corpus petition seeking custody of her four minor children. The court found that the petitioner had abandoned her husband and children in February 2025 and left her matrimonial home, and after the husband's death in April 2026, the children were living with their paternal aunt and uncle (respondents 5 and 7). The court, after interacting with all four children who expressed their preference to remain with their relatives, disposed of the petition while leaving the petitioner free to pursue alternative legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case