HARPREET SINGH AND ANR. RK AGGARWAL vs NAHAR SINGH — RSA/2298/2005

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Sep-2005

CNR: PHHC010694942005

Filing Number

RSA/2298/2005

Filing Date

04-Jul-2005

Registration No

RSA/2298/2005

Registration Date

04-Jul-2005

Judge

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Coram

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Bench Type

Single

Category

96 - STATUTORY APPEALS INCOME TAX (DIRECT) ( 334 )

Sub-Category

( 334 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARPREET SINGH AND ANR. RK AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAHAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the regular second appeal filed by Harpreet Singh and another against Nahar Singh for non-prosecution. Despite proper service of notices (affixed at their residences as they refused acceptance), the appellants failed to appear or provide representation on the hearing date, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court granted them liberty to file a restoration application if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Oct-2005

    Mr. Justice Tapen Sen

  4. 26-Sep-2005

    Mr. Justice Tapen Sen

  5. 12-Sep-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Jul-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/2298/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the regular second appeal filed by Harpreet Singh and another against Nahar Singh for non-prosecution. Despite proper service of notices (affixed at their residences as they refused acceptance), the appellants failed to appear or provide representation on the hearing date, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. The court granted them liberty to file a restoration application if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case