RAJWINDER KAUR vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/14826/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010691542026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/24739/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/14826/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJWINDER KAUR

    Adv. ARPANDEEP NARULA

  2. 2.RAJWINDER KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.RAJWINDER KAUR

  3. 3.CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

  4. 4.STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

  5. 5.DIRECTOR PRINCIPAL

  6. 6.SUPERINTENDENT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide Rajwinder Kaur's pending interim relief application (Original Application No. 1203 of 2025) within one month, as it had been pending for approximately one year and related to government accommodation retention. The court made no observations on merits but requested the Tribunal to pass an appropriate order, with the respondents raising no objection to the plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide Rajwinder Kaur's pending interim relief application (Original Application No. 1203 of 2025) within one month, as it had been pending for approximately one year and related to government accommodation retention. The court made no observations on merits but requested the Tribunal to pass an appropriate order, with the respondents raising no objection to the plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case