GURCHARAN SINGH @ CHARNA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/23423/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010688362026

Filing Number

CRM-M/31647/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/23423/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURCHARAN SINGH @ CHARNA

    Adv. MANVINDER SIDHU

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-23423-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Gurcharan Singh in a narcotic drugs case (FIR No. 104/2024 under NDPS Act). The Court held that Singh's continued detention violated Article 21 rights, as investigation was complete, charges remained unframed, and trial would take considerable time. The Court applied the principle "bail is a rule, jail is an exception" and rejected the State's argument about criminal antecedents, ruling that bail decisions must focus on the accused's role in the specific case rather than involvement in other matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/23423/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-23423-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Gurcharan Singh in a narcotic drugs case (FIR No. 104/2024 under NDPS Act). The Court held that Singh's continued detention violated Article 21 rights, as investigation was complete, charges remained unframed, and trial would take considerable time. The Court applied the principle "bail is a rule, jail is an exception" and rejected the State's argument about criminal antecedents, ruling that bail decisions must focus on the accused's role in the specific case rather than involvement in other matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case