KAMAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25833/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010686262026

Filing Number

CRM-M/31559/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25833/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL

    Adv. JASWINDER SINGH RANDHAWA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/25833/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Kamal, who was arrested in January 2026 on charges of causing injuries as part of an unlawful assembly (IPC Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 452, and 326). The court found this a "version and cross-version" case where the petitioner's brother initially filed an FIR, and the accused subsequently filed a counter-complaint (GDR). Justice Manisha Batra held that prolonged pre-trial detention was unjustified since investigation was complete, the challan had not been filed, trial would take considerable time, similarly-situated co-accused received anticipatory bail, and no custodial interrogation was required. The court noted bail is the rule and jail the exception, ordering release on personal/surety bonds while clarifying observations were not opinions on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25833/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/25833/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Kamal, who was arrested in January 2026 on charges of causing injuries as part of an unlawful assembly (IPC Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 452, and 326). The court found this a "version and cross-version" case where the petitioner's brother initially filed an FIR, and the accused subsequently filed a counter-complaint (GDR). Justice Manisha Batra held that prolonged pre-trial detention was unjustified since investigation was complete, the challan had not been filed, trial would take considerable time, similarly-situated co-accused received anticipatory bail, and no custodial interrogation was required. The court noted bail is the rule and jail the exception, ordering release on personal/surety bonds while clarifying observations were not opinions on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case