AMARJIT KAUR AND ORS vs PREM KUMAR AND ORS — FAO/5450/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010684832023

Filing Number

FAO/27513/2023

Filing Date

22-May-2023

Registration No

FAO/5450/2023

Registration Date

30-Sep-2023

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.27 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 892 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMARJIT KAUR AND ORS

    Adv. HARDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.RAJVIR SINGH

  3. 3.SURJIT KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREM KUMAR AND ORS

  2. 2.BAGHEL SINGH

  3. 3.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO 5450/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellants' appeal seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation from Rs. 8,38,339/- awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The court held that the tribunal correctly assessed the deceased's income at Rs. 9,192/- monthly (based on minimum wage notification) since claimants failed to produce evidence supporting their claim of Rs. 25,000/- monthly income, and found no error in the compensation calculation, multipliers applied, or deductions made for personal expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/5450/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO 5450/2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellants' appeal seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation from Rs. 8,38,339/- awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The court held that the tribunal correctly assessed the deceased's income at Rs. 9,192/- monthly (based on minimum wage notification) since claimants failed to produce evidence supporting their claim of Rs. 25,000/- monthly income, and found no error in the compensation calculation, multipliers applied, or deductions made for personal expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case