SUNNY vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/23087/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010683132026

Filing Number

CRM-M/31404/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/23087/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNNY

    Adv. PARVEEN CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/23087/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sunny in an FIR involving unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and Arms Act violations arising from a December 2022 incident. Justice Manisha Batra found that pre-trial incarceration was unnecessary, noting Sunny was not named in the original FIR, was implicated only through a co-accused's disclosure statement (legally inadmissible), and no specific act was attributed to him despite a 2.5-year delay in nomination. The court allowed bail subject to conditions including surrender within 10 days, cooperation with investigation, furnishing bonds, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/23087/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/23087/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Sunny in an FIR involving unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and Arms Act violations arising from a December 2022 incident. Justice Manisha Batra found that pre-trial incarceration was unnecessary, noting Sunny was not named in the original FIR, was implicated only through a co-accused's disclosure statement (legally inadmissible), and no specific act was attributed to him despite a 2.5-year delay in nomination. The court allowed bail subject to conditions including surrender within 10 days, cooperation with investigation, furnishing bonds, and non-tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case