BACHITAR SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/26955/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,506,148,149,120-B,325,307IPC. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010681032023

Filing Number

CRM-M/40752/2023

Filing Date

22-May-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/26955/2023

Registration Date

24-May-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,506,148,149,120-B,325,307IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BACHITAR SINGH

    Adv. MANSUR ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.JASWANT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Bachitar Singh's petition seeking to quash FIR No. 109 (dated 04.10.2017) as withdrawn with liberty, allowing him to raise all available pleas before the trial court. The court granted the petitioner's application for exemption from personal appearance, though the trial court may impose conditions or insist on his presence as deemed fit, and directed expeditious trial proceedings given the FIR's age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26955/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Bachitar Singh's petition seeking to quash FIR No. 109 (dated 04.10.2017) as withdrawn with liberty, allowing him to raise all available pleas before the trial court. The court granted the petitioner's application for exemption from personal appearance, though the trial court may impose conditions or insist on his presence as deemed fit, and directed expeditious trial proceedings given the FIR's age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case