KIRNA RANI vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/22914/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010676672026

Filing Number

CRM-M/31070/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22914/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal

Coram

Ms. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRNA RANI

    Adv. Deepak Goyal

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Ms. Justice Shalini Singh NagpalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed anticipatory bail petitions filed by Kirna Rani and Sinder Kaur in a property fraud case involving a disputed 8-marla plot in Fatehabad. The court found prima facie evidence of criminal conspiracy, noting that an impersonator was brought to impersonate deceased Kartar Kaur during the fraudulent sale deed registration, and that both petitioners were active participants in this scheme. Given the serious nature of allegations and no extraordinary circumstances warranting bail, the court rejected their petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22914/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed anticipatory bail petitions filed by Kirna Rani and Sinder Kaur in a property fraud case involving a disputed 8-marla plot in Fatehabad. The court found prima facie evidence of criminal conspiracy, noting that an impersonator was brought to impersonate deceased Kartar Kaur during the fraudulent sale deed registration, and that both petitioners were active participants in this scheme. Given the serious nature of allegations and no extraordinary circumstances warranting bail, the court rejected their petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case