HARDEV SINGH ALIAS HARDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/22513/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010674742026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30966/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22513/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Justice (To Be Nominated)

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.17 - REGULAR BAIL PUNJAB (AGNST WOMEN) ( 286 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARDEV SINGH ALIAS HARDEEP SINGH

    Adv. YAJUR SHARMA

  2. 2.HARDEV SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.HARDEV SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    Summary of CRM-M-22513-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Hardev Singh's bail petition in a POCSO Act case involving alleged rape of a 15-year-old minor. Despite the petitioner's argument that key witnesses (the victim, her parents) turned hostile, the court found sufficient grounds to deny bail based on DNA evidence confirming the petitioner's semen on the minor, her detailed statement to the magistrate, and the significant age disparity (petitioner ~30, victim 15), establishing the minor could not legally consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22513/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M-22513-2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Hardev Singh's bail petition in a POCSO Act case involving alleged rape of a 15-year-old minor. Despite the petitioner's argument that key witnesses (the victim, her parents) turned hostile, the court found sufficient grounds to deny bail based on DNA evidence confirming the petitioner's semen on the minor, her detailed statement to the magistrate, and the significant age disparity (petitioner ~30, victim 15), establishing the minor could not legally consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case