UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD vs JASPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER — CR/3538/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010672102026

Filing Number

CR/24046/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CR/3538/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.14 - WORKMEN/EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT ( 508 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. HARSH AGGARWAL

  2. 2.JASPREETKAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.JASPREETKAUR

  3. 3.GURMTI SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/3538/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed United India Insurance Co.'s petition challenging the lower court's rejection of its application to implead the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) as a necessary party in a death compensation claim. The court held that whether the deceased employee was covered under the ESI Act is a factual issue to be proven through evidence, not a jurisdictional matter requiring ESIC's impleadment, and that ESIC is not a necessary party in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/3538/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/3538/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed United India Insurance Co.'s petition challenging the lower court's rejection of its application to implead the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) as a necessary party in a death compensation claim. The court held that whether the deceased employee was covered under the ESI Act is a factual issue to be proven through evidence, not a jurisdictional matter requiring ESIC's impleadment, and that ESIC is not a necessary party in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case