RAVI ALIAS MITHLESH ALIAS BUM BUM vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/22726/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010671572026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30840/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22726/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Coram

Ms. Justice Kirti Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.17 - REGULAR BAIL PUNJAB (AGNST WOMEN) ( 286 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI ALIAS MITHLESH ALIAS BUM BUM

    Adv. Rajneesh Shelly

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.VISHNU DEV SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Kirti SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/22726/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Ravi (accused of kidnapping in a 2009 FIR) after he spent 2 months 28 days in custody. The court found that charges had only recently been framed with no prosecution witnesses examined yet, the petitioner had no criminal record, and he had married the alleged victim's daughter in 2009 with whom he has five children. The court emphasized that prolonged pre-trial detention without trial prospects violates Article 21 constitutional rights and the principle that "bail is the rule, jail the exception," particularly where no flight risk or witness tampering concerns existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22726/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/22726/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Ravi (accused of kidnapping in a 2009 FIR) after he spent 2 months 28 days in custody. The court found that charges had only recently been framed with no prosecution witnesses examined yet, the petitioner had no criminal record, and he had married the alleged victim's daughter in 2009 with whom he has five children. The court emphasized that prolonged pre-trial detention without trial prospects violates Article 21 constitutional rights and the principle that "bail is the rule, jail the exception," particularly where no flight risk or witness tampering concerns existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case