RADHIKA vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/12377/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010671402026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/24035/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/12377/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.62 - DISPUTES REGARDING PASSPORT ( 755 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RADHIKA

    Adv. TUSHAR WADHWA

  2. 2.Radhika

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Radhika

  3. 3.Union of india through Secretary

  4. 4.Regional Passport Officer

  5. 5.Passport Seva Kendra Ludhiana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioner Radhika to withdraw her writ petition seeking passport reissuance with liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The Regional Passport Officer clarified that the petitioner's application for ECR deletion was pending verification from PSEB regarding her school certificate (which was allegedly suppressed in her original 2017 passport application) and would be decided per extant rules upon receipt of PSEB's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/12377/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioner Radhika to withdraw her writ petition seeking passport reissuance with liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The Regional Passport Officer clarified that the petitioner's application for ECR deletion was pending verification from PSEB regarding her school certificate (which was allegedly suppressed in her original 2017 passport application) and would be decided per extant rules upon receipt of PSEB's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case