GYANENDRA SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/22443/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010668672026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30652/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22443/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GYANENDRA SINGH

    Adv. SHAILENDER SINGH

  2. 2.GYANENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.GYANENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-22443-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gyanendra Singh, who was accused of dishonest dealership conduct, extortion (demanding Rs. 60 lakhs), defamatory social media campaigns, and threats against a company's officers. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is an exception," finding that after three months in custody, investigation completion, clean antecedents, and a lengthy trial ahead, continued detention served no purpose. The petitioner was ordered released on furnishing requisite bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22443/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-22443-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gyanendra Singh, who was accused of dishonest dealership conduct, extortion (demanding Rs. 60 lakhs), defamatory social media campaigns, and threats against a company's officers. The court applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is an exception," finding that after three months in custody, investigation completion, clean antecedents, and a lengthy trial ahead, continued detention served no purpose. The petitioner was ordered released on furnishing requisite bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case