WASEEM AKRAM AND OTHERS vs YASHVIR SINGH AND OTHERS — COCP/1899/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010667982026
Filing Number
COCP/23855/2026
Filing Date
20-Apr-2026
Registration No
COCP/1899/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Coram
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
Bench Type
Single
Category
34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WASEEM AKRAM AND OTHERS
Adv. MAZLISH KHAN
-
2.YASHVIR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.YASHVIR SINGH AND OTHERS
-
2.YASHVIR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Ms. Justice Harpreet Kaur JeewanView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the contempt petition filed by Waseem Akram and others seeking proceedings under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against respondents for willful disobedience of court directions from CWP-5904-2026 (dated 25.02.2026). The State counsel submitted that a competent authority had examined the matter and issued a detailed speaking order on 24.04.2026, which the court accepted as adequate compliance. The petition was disposed of with liberty to petitioners to pursue appropriate alternate remedies and to challenge the 24.04.2026 order if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COCP/1899/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the contempt petition filed by Waseem Akram and others seeking proceedings under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against respondents for willful disobedience of court directions from CWP-5904-2026 (dated 25.02.2026). The State counsel submitted that a competent authority had examined the matter and issued a detailed speaking order on 24.04.2026, which the court accepted as adequate compliance. The petition was disposed of with liberty to petitioners to pursue appropriate alternate remedies and to challenge the 24.04.2026 order if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts