SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDEEP vs RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS — CRM-M/22659/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010666392026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30548/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22659/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDEEP

    Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.RAJESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS

  2. 2.RAJESH KUMAR

  3. 3.KAMLA DEVI

  4. 4.MUKESH

  5. 5.SEMWAWATI

  6. 6.LALI DEIV

  7. 7.CHANDKORI

  8. 8.KIRNA DEVI

  9. 9.SUSHEELA DEVI

  10. 10.STATE OF HARYANA

  11. 11.VIDYA DEVI

  12. 12.SATYA WATI

  13. 13.MANJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-22659-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside orders dated 16.04.2026 and 08.04.2026 that had vacated an interim stay on property receiver appointment. The Court found that the interim stay, granted on 21.01.2026 during preliminary hearing of a revision petition, was inadvertently vacated due to counsel's absence and exercised its inherent jurisdiction to restore it. The Court directed parties to appear before the Revisional Court on 29.05.2026 for final adjudication while cautioning that the stay could be cancelled if misused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22659/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-22659-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside orders dated 16.04.2026 and 08.04.2026 that had vacated an interim stay on property receiver appointment. The Court found that the interim stay, granted on 21.01.2026 during preliminary hearing of a revision petition, was inadvertently vacated due to counsel's absence and exercised its inherent jurisdiction to restore it. The Court directed parties to appear before the Revisional Court on 29.05.2026 for final adjudication while cautioning that the stay could be cancelled if misused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case