RAJBIR @ ANURAG vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/23036/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010665422026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30456/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/23036/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.18 - REGULAR BAIL HARYANA (AGNST WOMEN) ( 287 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJBIR @ ANURAG

    Adv. KUSHAGER GOYAL

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Alok JainView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/23036/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to 18-year-old Rajbir @ Anurag, who was arrested in September 2024 on charges including rape and criminal intimidation involving a 16-year-old girl. The court found the case to be one of adolescent relationship gone wrong, noting that DNA reports were inconclusive, the FIR was filed with a three-day delay, and critically, the complainant (victim's mother) entered into a compromise agreement concluding the petitioner was not guilty. Given the victim and complainant's year-long delay in providing trial testimony, the petitioner's clean record, and his over 19 months in custody, the court held continued detention served no purpose and ordered his release on specified bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/23036/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/23036/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to 18-year-old Rajbir @ Anurag, who was arrested in September 2024 on charges including rape and criminal intimidation involving a 16-year-old girl. The court found the case to be one of adolescent relationship gone wrong, noting that DNA reports were inconclusive, the FIR was filed with a three-day delay, and critically, the complainant (victim's mother) entered into a compromise agreement concluding the petitioner was not guilty. Given the victim and complainant's year-long delay in providing trial testimony, the petitioner's clean record, and his over 19 months in custody, the court held continued detention served no purpose and ordered his release on specified bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case