RAMANDEEP KAUR vs JAGSEER SINGH — TA/584/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Apr-2025

CNR: PHHC010662462025

e-Filing Number

24-04-2025

Filing Number

TA/25493/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

TA/584/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMANDEEP KAUR

    Adv. GAGANDEEP KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGSEER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/584/2025 Ramandeep Kaur v. Jagseer Singh The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Ramandeep Kaur's petition to transfer her husband's Hindu Marriage Act case from Family Court, Bathinda (Phul) to Faridkot. The court found merit considering the wife's hardship: she is jobless, economically dependent on elderly parents, lives 55km from the proceedings, and has custody of two minor children (aged 7 and 1.5 years). The court emphasized that in matrimonial transfers, wife's convenience and socioeconomic conditions must be prioritized, especially when multiple proceedings involve the same parties. Transfer was granted subject to conditions including mediation attempts and parties' appearance on 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/584/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/584/2025 Ramandeep Kaur v. Jagseer Singh The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Ramandeep Kaur's petition to transfer her husband's Hindu Marriage Act case from Family Court, Bathinda (Phul) to Faridkot. The court found merit considering the wife's hardship: she is jobless, economically dependent on elderly parents, lives 55km from the proceedings, and has custody of two minor children (aged 7 and 1.5 years). The court emphasized that in matrimonial transfers, wife's convenience and socioeconomic conditions must be prioritized, especially when multiple proceedings involve the same parties. Transfer was granted subject to conditions including mediation attempts and parties' appearance on 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case