NAVDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/22304/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010661702026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30186/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22304/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. HARCHAND SINGH BATTH

  2. 2.NAVDEEP SINGH

  3. 3.KAWALJEET KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.NAVDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted absolute anticipatory bail to petitioners Navdeep Singh and another in FIR No.58 (Sections 331(4) & 305 BNS) registered at Police Station Ajnala, Amritsar Rural. The court found that the petitioners had complied with the earlier interim bail order by joining and cooperating with the investigation, and the State conceded they were no longer required for custodial interrogation. The petitioners must continue joining investigation as called and comply with BNSS Section 482(2) conditions; however, any arrest on additional charges requires fresh court approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22304/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted absolute anticipatory bail to petitioners Navdeep Singh and another in FIR No.58 (Sections 331(4) & 305 BNS) registered at Police Station Ajnala, Amritsar Rural. The court found that the petitioners had complied with the earlier interim bail order by joining and cooperating with the investigation, and the State conceded they were no longer required for custodial interrogation. The petitioners must continue joining investigation as called and comply with BNSS Section 482(2) conditions; however, any arrest on additional charges requires fresh court approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case