PRIYA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRWP/4605/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010661342026

Filing Number

CRWP/30276/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRWP/4605/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRIYA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. GAYATRI

  2. 2.PRIYA

  3. 3.RAJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.PRIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    CRWP/4605/2026 Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection to two major adults living in a live-in relationship against threats from their family members. The Court held that Article 21's right to life and liberty is fundamental and sacrosanct, requiring state protection regardless of whether the couple is married or in an unmarried live-in relationship. The Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Ambala to consider the petitioners' security representation and take appropriate protective measures, while clarifying this does not endorse the relationship's legality or shield them from criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/4605/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRWP/4605/2026 Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection to two major adults living in a live-in relationship against threats from their family members. The Court held that Article 21's right to life and liberty is fundamental and sacrosanct, requiring state protection regardless of whether the couple is married or in an unmarried live-in relationship. The Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Ambala to consider the petitioners' security representation and take appropriate protective measures, while clarifying this does not endorse the relationship's legality or shield them from criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case