SAAB SINGH ALIAS SAHAB SINGH ALIAS SABHI ALIAS PAHARU vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/22437/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010660222026

Filing Number

CRM-M/30236/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/22437/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAAB SINGH ALIAS SAHAB SINGH ALIAS SABHI ALIAS PAHARU

    Adv. YAJUR SHARMA

  2. 2.SAAB SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SAAB SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/22437/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Saab Singh, arrested for possessing 21 grams of heroin under NDPS Act sections. The court found that despite completing investigation and framing charges, no prosecution witnesses had been examined in over 13 months of custody, making continued detention violative of Article 21 rights. The court rejected the State's argument about multiple criminal cases, holding that bail decisions must focus on current case circumstances, not criminal antecedents alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/22437/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/22437/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Saab Singh, arrested for possessing 21 grams of heroin under NDPS Act sections. The court found that despite completing investigation and framing charges, no prosecution witnesses had been examined in over 13 months of custody, making continued detention violative of Article 21 rights. The court rejected the State's argument about multiple criminal cases, holding that bail decisions must focus on current case circumstances, not criminal antecedents alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case