UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS vs CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS — CWP/14295/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010653892026

e-Filing Number

18-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/23327/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/14295/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

    Adv. MADHU DAYAL

  2. 2.Central Administrative Tribunal and others

  3. 3.Dr Gunjan

  4. 4.Dr Amit Gangani

  5. 5.Dr Ankita

  6. 6.Salma Rani

  7. 7.Dr Anterpreet Kaur

  8. 8.Dr Anterpreet Kaur

  9. 9.Dr Khushboo Singh

  10. 10.Dr Ravneet Kaur

  11. 11.Dr Sandaldeep Kaur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Central Administrative Tribunal and others

  3. 3.Dr Gunjan

  4. 4.Dr Amit Gangani

  5. 5.Dr Ankita

  6. 6.Salma Rani

  7. 7.Dr Anterpreet Kaur

  8. 8.Dr Anterpreet Kaur

  9. 9.Dr Khushboo Singh

  10. 10.Dr Ravneet Kaur

  11. 11.Dr Sandaldeep Kaur

  12. 12.Dr Vasudha Bansal

  13. 13.Dr Reenu

  14. 14.Dr Gaurav Kalra

  15. 15.Ms Akshata Verma

  16. 16.Ms Nupur Bhatnagar

  17. 17.Ms Sugandha Sapru

  18. 18.Dr Simarjit Kaur

  19. 19.Ms Kumari Rakhi

  20. 20.Dr Ravinder Kumar

  21. 21.Ms Anusha Prashar

  22. 22.Dr Gaganpreet

  23. 23.Dr Meenakshi Madan

  24. 24.Dr Meenakshi Madan

  25. 25.Ms Manisha

  26. 26.Dr Satvinder Singh

  27. 27.Dr Upasna Thapliyal

  28. 28.Ms Chandana Rajput

  29. 29.Dr Taranjot Kaur

  30. 30.Dr Harneet Kaur

  31. 31.Dr Rajni Thakur

  32. 32.Ms Sonika Devi

  33. 33.Dr Aarti Bhatt

  34. 34.Gifty

  35. 35.Dr Radha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Union Territory Chandigarh's petition challenging a CAT interim order allowing respondents to continue in service. The court directed the CAT to decide the pending amendment application by July 16, 2026 or within two weeks, after which Chandigarh must file its reply within four weeks, with a final CAT order on the substantive issue within three months. Costs were waived given the legitimate reason for delayed reply due to the pending amendment application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Union Territory Chandigarh's petition challenging a CAT interim order allowing respondents to continue in service. The court directed the CAT to decide the pending amendment application by July 16, 2026 or within two weeks, after which Chandigarh must file its reply within four weeks, with a final CAT order on the substantive issue within three months. Costs were waived given the legitimate reason for delayed reply due to the pending amendment application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case