NARINDER SINGH BHANGU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/21489/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010653742026

Filing Number

CRM-M/29944/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/21489/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARINDER SINGH BHANGU

    Adv. N.P.S. MANN

  2. 2.NARINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.NARINDER SINGH

  3. 3.SACHI SINGH BEDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M No.21489/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Narinder Singh Bhangu's anticipatory bail petition and made absolute the interim anticipatory bail granted on 20.04.2026. The court found that since the petitioner had already joined the investigation into FIR No.61 (charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS 2023), custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the petitioner could not be forced to self-incriminate or assist in recovery of incriminating material that would prejudice his right of defence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/21489/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M No.21489/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Narinder Singh Bhangu's anticipatory bail petition and made absolute the interim anticipatory bail granted on 20.04.2026. The court found that since the petitioner had already joined the investigation into FIR No.61 (charges under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS 2023), custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the petitioner could not be forced to self-incriminate or assist in recovery of incriminating material that would prejudice his right of defence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case