DIWAN SINGH AND OTHES vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/11898/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010653072026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2026
Filing Number
CWP/23299/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/11898/2026
Registration Date
18-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa
Coram
Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIWAN SINGH AND OTHES
Adv. GARVIT MITTAL
-
2.State of Haryana And Others
-
3.Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Department of Finance
-
4.Director General of Police, Haryana
-
5.Surjit Singh
-
6.Birbal Singh
-
7.Attar Singh
-
8.Karan Singh
-
9.Dalbir Singh
-
10.Avtar Singh
-
11.Bhim Singh
-
12.Khushi Ram
-
13.Devender Singh
-
14.Maya Ram
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.State of Haryana And Others
-
3.Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Department of Finance
-
4.Director General of Police, Haryana
-
5.Surjit Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/11898/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition with a direction to the Principal Secretary (Respondent No.3) to consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice dated 08.12.2025 within six months, without commenting on the merits. The State of Haryana accepted the prayer and did not object, leading to an unopposed disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/11898/2026
Case Summary: CWP/11898/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition with a direction to the Principal Secretary (Respondent No.3) to consider and decide the petitioners' legal notice dated 08.12.2025 within six months, without commenting on the merits. The State of Haryana accepted the prayer and did not object, leading to an unopposed disposal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts