DALJINDER SINGH JANDU vs PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS — CWP/11837/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010651152026

e-Filing Number

17-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/23222/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11837/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DALJINDER SINGH JANDU

    Adv. KANWAR ABHAY SINGH

  2. 2.Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd and others

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer

  4. 4.Chief Engineer

  5. 5.Xen

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The petition was disposed of without adjudication on the merits. The petitioner sought to challenge PSPCL's order requiring him to bear costs for altering an overhead 11KV electricity line on his property under CEA Regulations 2023. After PSPCL argued the petitioner had alternative remedies through Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum and Electricity Ombudsman, the petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition and sought liberty to approach those forums instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The petition was disposed of without adjudication on the merits. The petitioner sought to challenge PSPCL's order requiring him to bear costs for altering an overhead 11KV electricity line on his property under CEA Regulations 2023. After PSPCL argued the petitioner had alternative remedies through Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum and Electricity Ombudsman, the petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition and sought liberty to approach those forums instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case