KARTAR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY — CWP/11904/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010650802026

e-Filing Number

17-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/23207/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11904/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARTAR SINGH

    Adv. RAVINDER MALIK

  2. 2.Kartar Singh

  3. 3.Harbir Singh

  4. 4.Surender Singh

  5. 5.Anand

  6. 6.Sudama Parsad

  7. 7.Shri Krishan

  8. 8.Satish Kumar

  9. 9.Surender Kumar

  10. 10.Rakesh Kumar

  11. 11.Jai Bhagwan

  12. 12.Anil Sha

  13. 13.Chamdeshwar Gupta

  14. 14.Joginder Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY

  2. 2.Kartar Singh

  3. 3.Harbir Singh

  4. 4.Surender Singh

  5. 5.Anand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition seeking regularization of the petitioners' services after 25+ years of continuous employment. The court directed respondent No.4 (State of Haryana) to treat the writ petition as a comprehensive representation, consider the petitioners' regularization claim, and pass a reasoned speaking order within 3 months after providing them a hearing opportunity, with immediate relief if they are found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11904/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition seeking regularization of the petitioners' services after 25+ years of continuous employment. The court directed respondent No.4 (State of Haryana) to treat the writ petition as a comprehensive representation, consider the petitioners' regularization claim, and pass a reasoned speaking order within 3 months after providing them a hearing opportunity, with immediate relief if they are found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case