RAMESH KUMAR ALIAS RAMESH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/21859/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010647922026

Filing Number

CRM-M/29624/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/21859/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH KUMAR ALIAS RAMESH

    Adv. RYTHEM BAJAJ

  2. 2.RAMESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.RAMESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/21859/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to Ramesh Kumar alias Ramesh in an assault case (FIR No. 184/2025) involving charges under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 118, 115(2), and 117(2). The court found that since the petitioner had already joined the investigation, custodial interrogation was unnecessary and unlikely to yield results, especially given that no significant evidence remained to be collected and the injuries were relatively minor. The court converted the interim anticipatory bail granted on 21.04.2026 into absolute bail, noting no evidence that the petitioner would tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/21859/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/21859/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to Ramesh Kumar alias Ramesh in an assault case (FIR No. 184/2025) involving charges under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 118, 115(2), and 117(2). The court found that since the petitioner had already joined the investigation, custodial interrogation was unnecessary and unlikely to yield results, especially given that no significant evidence remained to be collected and the injuries were relatively minor. The court converted the interim anticipatory bail granted on 21.04.2026 into absolute bail, noting no evidence that the petitioner would tamper with evidence or influence witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case