GURDIP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/11880/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010645662026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22961/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11880/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.32 - SENIORITY DISPUTE OF EMPLOYEES SCO AND SB PUNJAB ( 463 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURDIP SINGH

    Adv. NITESH SINGLA

  2. 2.State of Punjab And Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab And Others

  3. 3.The Director Local Government Department

  4. 4.Superintendent

  5. 5.The Additional Deputy Commissioner

  6. 6.Rajinder Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/11880/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Municipal Council, Rampura Phul (Respondent No.5) to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 24.02.2026 within three months by passing a reasoned order after affording him a hearing. The petitioner challenged a seniority list issued without addressing his submitted objections, which had been acknowledged but unresolved since November 2025. The court disposed of the petition after both the State and respondent authorities agreed to the time-bound decision-making direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11880/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/11880/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the Municipal Council, Rampura Phul (Respondent No.5) to consider and decide the petitioner's legal notice dated 24.02.2026 within three months by passing a reasoned order after affording him a hearing. The petitioner challenged a seniority list issued without addressing his submitted objections, which had been acknowledged but unresolved since November 2025. The court disposed of the petition after both the State and respondent authorities agreed to the time-bound decision-making direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case