HARJEET SINGH vs HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED — CWP/11820/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010645652026

e-Filing Number

17-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22960/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11820/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARJEET SINGH

    Adv. RAVI SHARMA

  2. 2.Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED

  2. 2.Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

  3. 3.Executive Engineer, Division (TS), Haryana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/11820/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Harjeet Singh's petition seeking regularization of his contractual employment as a Shift Attendant with Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited. The court held that since Singh was engaged on a contractual basis, did not seek regularization during his service tenure, and filed the petition only after his retirement on 31.12.2024 (nine months later), the employer-employee relationship had terminated and no legal right to claim regularization survived. The court found the issue settled by prior precedent and rejected his claims based on delay and lack of standing post-retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11820/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/11820/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Harjeet Singh's petition seeking regularization of his contractual employment as a Shift Attendant with Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited. The court held that since Singh was engaged on a contractual basis, did not seek regularization during his service tenure, and filed the petition only after his retirement on 31.12.2024 (nine months later), the employer-employee relationship had terminated and no legal right to claim regularization survived. The court found the issue settled by prior precedent and rejected his claims based on delay and lack of standing post-retirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case