SURAJ PARKASH vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJALI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND OTHERS — CWP/11868/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 21st April 2026.

CNR: PHHC010644622026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22924/2026

Filing Date

17-04-2026

Registration No

CWP/11868/2026

Registration Date

18-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

SURAJ PARKASH

Adv. MOHNISH SHARMA

Suraj Parkash

Respondent(s)

UTTAR HARYANA BIJALI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND OTHERS

Suraj Parkash

Chief engineer Operation UHBVN

Under Secretary HR2 chief general manager administration uhbvnl

Chief account officer UHBVN

Virender Singh mor

Orders

21-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (UHBVNL) to treat the writ petition as a comprehensive representation and decide the petitioner's case within three months, considering Supreme Court precedent that employees working on higher posts cannot be denied corresponding salaries. The court found the respondents had no objection to this direction and ordered a reasoned decision with opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, with relief to be granted forthwith if found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (UHBVNL) to treat the writ petition as a comprehensive representation and decide the petitioner's case within three months, considering Supreme Court precedent that employees working on higher posts cannot be denied corresponding salaries. The court found the respondents had no objection to this direction and ordered a reasoned decision with opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, with relief to be granted forthwith if found entitled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case