ANUJ DOGRA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/11895/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010644422026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CWP/22898/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/11895/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

8.4 - HUID HARYANA((HOUSING URBAN INDL. DEVELOPMENT) ( 405 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUJ DOGRA

    Adv. SANJIV KUMAR AGGARWAL

  2. 2.State of Haryana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana

  3. 3.Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran

  4. 4.Chief Adminsitrator, HSVP

  5. 5.Administrator, HSVP

  6. 6.Estate Officer HSVP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Anuj Dogra's petition challenging the deemed withdrawal of his Letter of Intent for a commercial site in Panchkula worth Rs. 2,70,77,200. The court found that Dogra failed to deposit the required 15% amount within 30 days of the LOI issuance, triggering automatic withdrawal under Clause 33 of the e-auction policy, and rejected his plea based on his mother's illness since no policy provision allowed condonation of such delays. The petition was dismissed as devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/11895/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Anuj Dogra's petition challenging the deemed withdrawal of his Letter of Intent for a commercial site in Panchkula worth Rs. 2,70,77,200. The court found that Dogra failed to deposit the required 15% amount within 30 days of the LOI issuance, triggering automatic withdrawal under Clause 33 of the e-auction policy, and rejected his plea based on his mother's illness since no policy provision allowed condonation of such delays. The petition was dismissed as devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case