ISHWAR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA — CWP/14275/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Aug-2021

CNR: PHHC010643562021

Filing Number

CWP/23859/2021

Filing Date

22-Jul-2021

Registration No

CWP/14275/2021

Registration Date

29-Jul-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.27 - SER-ENGINEERING-HAR(PWD,B&R&PUB.HEALTH-RETIRAL ( 717 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHWAR SINGH

    Adv. KARAN BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF HARYANA

  3. 3.THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ishwar Singh's petition as infructuous, finding that the State of Haryana had already granted him the revised pay scale of Rs. 13,500-17,250 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and fixed his revised pension at Rs. 6,882 (exceeding 50% of initial pay), thereby fulfilling his relief sought. The court upheld that Singh, having retired as Executive Engineer before 01.09.2009, was not entitled to the improved pay structure (PB-4) introduced on 19.08.2009, which applied only to officers in service on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Aug-2021

    Other

  4. 22-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14275/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ishwar Singh's petition as infructuous, finding that the State of Haryana had already granted him the revised pay scale of Rs. 13,500-17,250 w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and fixed his revised pension at Rs. 6,882 (exceeding 50% of initial pay), thereby fulfilling his relief sought. The court upheld that Singh, having retired as Executive Engineer before 01.09.2009, was not entitled to the improved pay structure (PB-4) introduced on 19.08.2009, which applied only to officers in service on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case