ROHIT KUMAR ALIAS NEELA DHOBI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/25857/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010642352026

Filing Number

CRM-M/29302/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/25857/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR ALIAS NEELA DHOBI

    Adv. S.K. CHAWLA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Rohit Kumar's bail petition on May 13, 2026. The petitioner was charged with causing a wrist amputation injury during a violent group attack in Faridkot on November 4, 2022, under sections including attempt to murder and causing grievous hurt. Though in custody since January 2023 with only 8 of 34 prosecution witnesses examined, the court found the allegations "extremely grave" and held that prolonged custody alone cannot override the serious nature of charges, distinguishing his case from co-accused who received bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/25857/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Rohit Kumar's bail petition on May 13, 2026. The petitioner was charged with causing a wrist amputation injury during a violent group attack in Faridkot on November 4, 2022, under sections including attempt to murder and causing grievous hurt. Though in custody since January 2023 with only 8 of 34 prosecution witnesses examined, the court found the allegations "extremely grave" and held that prolonged custody alone cannot override the serious nature of charges, distinguishing his case from co-accused who received bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case